FILE:  <ch-55.htm>                                                                                                                                                                GENERAL INDEX                               [Navigate to   MAIN MENU ]
 
| GRAPELEAF SKELETONIZER (Western)      Harrisina brillians Barnes & McDunnough -- Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae (Contacts)     ---- CLICK on Photo to enlarge & search for Subject Matter with Ctrl/F.                     GO TO ALL:  Bio-Control Cases   
                                                                                                                   In 1950 efforts
  were initiated in the University of California to control grapeleaf
  skeletonizer biologically. 
  Parasitoids were introduced, with two species, the braconid, Apanteles harrisinae Muesebeck and the tachinid, Ametadoria miscella (Wulp) (= Sturmia
  harrisinae Coquillett) predominating
  (Clausen 1961).  A virulent granulosis
  virus was also accidentally introduced. 
  Initially, Apanteles
  was the most abundant of the two parasitoids and contributed to the reduction
  of the infestations, but later it declined in importance because of heavy
  mortality from attack by hyperparasitoids, especially Dibrachys sp. (Clausen 1978).  Although a sharp decline in the number and severity of
  infestations was observed in southern California, this cannot be attributed
  to the activities of the two parasitoids only, because a virus disease,
  probably brought in with the shipment of larvae from Arizona in 1950-51,
  became established and spread rapidly (Smith et al. 1956).  The virus must be credited with a major
  role in control of the pest, and its rapid distribution over the infested
  area was undoubtedly facilitated by mechanical transmission from place to
  place via the parasitoids, contaminated by the diarrheic discharges of
  diseased caterpillars( Wehrle 1939, Lange 1944, Smith & Langston 1953, Smith
  et al. 1955a,b).          Surveys in San
  Diego County in 1982-1983 revealed that it was necessary to spray grapeleaf
  skeletonizer in commercial vineyards (Flaherty et al. 1985).  Abandoned untreated vineyards and backyard
  vines were severely defoliated despite the activity of the imported
  parasitoids.  Symptoms of virus
  infection were not observed in the survey. 
  Grapeleaf skeletonizer was not found in wild grapes, V. girdiana, except where they were in close proximity to
  heavily infested commercial V.
  vinifera vineyards (Flaherty
  & Wilson 1992).          The skeletonizer
  invaded the San Joaquin Valley in 1961 (Clausen 1961), and new infestations
  appeared thereafter throughout the Central Valley in spite of eradication
  efforts.  Renewed efforts to introduce
  natural enemies were made in the 1980's, which resulted in the translocation
  of parasitoids from southern California and the acquisition of new species
  and strains from Torreón vicinity in Mexico (E. F. Legner and B. Villegas,
  unpub. data).  Extensive insecticide
  treatment during introduction, however, precluded establishment in most
  areas.  Some success was achieved
  outside the principal grape production area near Redding, with the
  establishment of Apanteles
  spp. and Ametadoria spp.
  This insect is now regarded a serious pest of commercial vineyards and
  backyard vines, as well as in wild grapes, Vitis californica
  Bentham by Flaherty & Wilson (1992). 
  Apanteles harrisinae and A. miscella were not successfully established in the San
  Joaquin Valley (Flaherty et al. 1985). 
  Only a few parasitoid recoveries were made at release sites which may
  be related to heavy spray pressure during the introduction period (E. F.
  Legner, unpub. data).  Samples of
  larvae taken from heavily infested and abandoned vineyards in San Diego
  County showed only 13% parasitism, which is below the 42-62% reported by
  Clausen in 1953-54 (Clausen 1961). 
  There was also no evidence of virus present.  Clausen (1961) thought that the virus must be credited with the
  major role in reducing grapeleaf skeletonizer populations to low levels and
  exterminating many small infestations. 
  Flaherty et al. (1985) considered that at that time the virus was more
  widespread and had reduced grapeleaf skeletonizer populations to levels that
  made it more manageable by the parasitoids. 
  This may account for the greater parasitism reported by Clausen (1961)
  and that found by Flaherty et al. (1985). 
  However, the present absence of virus in abandoned vineyards in San
  Diego County and the absence of observable grapeleaf skeletonizer in wild
  grapes is considered an enigma (Flaherty & Wilson 1992).  The grapeleaf skeletonizer has shown
  cyclic abundance, however, and the surveys conducted in San Diego County
  could have been during one of the cyclic outbreaks.  Surveys by E. F. Legner & R. W. Warkentin (unpub. data)
  during other years have shown this insect to be as rare as reported by
  Clausen  earlier.  Also, widespread application of insecticides
  to vineyards in the south could be responsible for minimizing natural enemy
  activity.  In the San Joaquin Valley
  the virus of grapeleaf skeletonizer is extremely virulent and has the
  potential of becoming incorporated into an areawide biological control
  effort, including wild grapes, backyard vines and commercial vineyards
  (Flaherty et al. 1985).     REFERENCES:          [Additional references may be found at:   MELVYL
  Library ]   Bellows, T. S. & T. W. Fisher (eds.).  1999. Handbook
  of Biological Control:  Principles and
  Applications.  Academic Press, San
  Diego, New York.  1046 p.   Clausen, C.
  P.  1961.  Biological control
  of western grape leaf skeletonizer (Harrisina
  brillians B. & McD.) in
  California.  Hilgardia
  31:  613-37.   Clausen, C.
  P.  1978.  Zyagaenidae.  In:  C. P. Clausen, Introduced Parasites and
  Predators of Arthropod Pests and Weeds. 
  U. S. Dept. Agric., Agric. Handbk. No. 480.  545 p.   Flaherty, D. L. & L. T. Wilson.  1992. 
  Biological control of insects and mites on grapes.  In:  Principles and Application of Biological
  Control.  University of California
  Press, Berkeley, CA.  (in press).   Flaherty, D. L., L. T. Wilson, V. M. Stern
  & H. Kido.  1985.  Biological control in San Joaquin Valley
  vineyards. p. 501-20.  In:  M. A. Hoy &  D. C.
  Herzog (eds.), Biological Control in Agricultural IPM Systems.  Academic Press.  589 p.   Lange, W. H.,
  Jr.  1944.  The western grape
  leaf skeletonizer, Harrisina
  brillians, in
  California.  Calif. State Dept. Agric.
  Bull. 33:  98-104.   Smith, O. J. and R. L. Langston.  1953. 
  Continuous laboratory propagation of western grape leaf skeletonizer
  and parasites by prevention of diapause. 
  J. Econ. Ent. 46:  477-84.   Smith, O. J., A. G. Diboll & J. H.
  Rosenberger.  1955a.  Laboratory studies of Pelecystoma harrisinae
  (Ashmead) an adventive braconid parasite of the western grape leaf
  skeletonizer.  Ann. Ent. Soc.
  Amer. 48:  232-37.   Smith, O. J.,
  P. H. Dunn & J. Rosenberger.  1955b. 
  Morphology and biology of Sturmia
  harrisinae Coquillett
  (Diptera), a parasite of the western grape leaf skeletonizer.  Calif. Univ. Publ. Ent. 10:  321-58.   Smith, O. J., K. M. Hughes, P. H. Dunn and I.
  M. Hall.  1956.  A granulosis virus disease of the western
  grape leaf skeletonizer and its transmission.  Canad. Ent. 88:  507-15.   Wehrle, L. P. 
  1939.  Grape Insects in
  Arizona.  Ariz. Agric. Expt. Sta.
  Bull. 162:  274-92.   |